Lily Tomlin Serves Up Slice of Life In “Grandma”
Reviewed by Shirrel Rhoades
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1896a/1896aa2236641c8714122f475908d847cb66f265" alt=""
So despite her fine dramatic turns in Robert Altman’s “Nashville,” Paul Schrader’s “The Walker,” and Franco Zefferini’s “Tea With Mussolini” … or her serious TV appearances in “Homicide: Life on the Streets,” “Damages,” and that four-year stint on “The West Wing” … we still think of her as a comedienne who acts rather than an actor who could be funny.
It’s a prejudice that many performers who started out in comedy have to struggle to overcome. Think: Jim Carrey, Robin Williams, Bill Murray.
But with Lily Tomlin’s new movie -- “Grandma,” now showing at the Tropic Cinema -- she bridges that gap, doing a very funny job of acting. This is Lily Tomlin’s first starring role in 27 years.
Here, she plays Elle, a lesbian poet who has broken up with her partner (Judy Greer). “You’re a footnote,” Elle sloughs her off. But she’s a tough cookie with a marshmallow center.
When Elle learns that her 18-year-old unmarried granddaughter Sage (Julia Garner) is pregnant, and needs a quick $600 for an abortion, she takes the girl under her wing. The two set off on a road trip in Elle’s old 1955 Dodge Royal, calling on friends in search of a loan. This stirs up old memories, as well as puzzles the girl’s dominating no-nonsense mother (Marcia Gay Harden).
They cross paths with Sage’s doofus boyfriend (Nat Woolf), a transgender tattoo artist (Laverne Cox), a tightfisted shop owner (the late Elizabeth Pena), and Elle’s ex-husband (laconic Sam Elliott).
At just 78 minutes, it’s a short movie. But it manages to cram in some big themes: abortion, lesbianism, trannies, family dynamics, and death.
No, this is not a pie-baking Norman Rockwell grandmother we’re dealing with in this story. Elle is a character close to Lily Tomlin’s own sensibilities -- gay, misanthropic, sarcastic, driven. It’s hard to tell she’s acting in this slice-of-life dramedy. But isn’t that the definition of a good performance?
srhoades@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment